Environmental assessment for the San Francisco Mountain/Mount Elden mineral withdrawal
Read Online
Share

Environmental assessment for the San Francisco Mountain/Mount Elden mineral withdrawal Peaks Ranger District, Coconino National Forest by United States. Forest Service. Southwestern Region.

  • 651 Want to read
  • ·
  • 39 Currently reading

Published by Coconino National Forest, Peaks Ranger District in Flagstaff, AZ (5075 N. Hwy. 89, Flagstaff, 86004) .
Written in English

Subjects:

Places:

  • Arizona,
  • San Francisco Peaks.,
  • United States.

Subjects:

  • Mineral industries -- Environmental aspects -- Arizona -- San Francisco Peaks.,
  • Mineral lands -- Arizona -- San Francisco Peaks.,
  • Mining law -- United States.

Book details:

Edition Notes

StatementSouthwestern Region, USDA Forest Service.
Classifications
LC ClassificationsTD195.M5 U55 2000
The Physical Object
Pagination17 p. :
Number of Pages17
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL6832937M
LC Control Number00327037

Download Environmental assessment for the San Francisco Mountain/Mount Elden mineral withdrawal

PDF EPUB FB2 MOBI RTF

Environmental Assessment, Extension of Public Land Order San Francisco Peaks/Mount Elden Recreation area, AZ 1. October Published 10/15/ FR Document PDF Withdrawal of Public Land for Whiskey Mountain Bighorn Sheep Winter Range, WY 1. March. Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. Source: Mineral Mountain Resources (SD) Inc; Pump has been placed in the vicinity of the water withdrawal site with pumping to begin late morning on Sunday, including a possible night shift. Source: Mineral Mountain Resources (SD) Inc; Mineral Mountain Resources begins mobilizing equipment to the site. Without mineral withdrawal, it's Forest Service policy to "assume" there's a right to mine under the archaic Mining Law—even on a National Wild and Scenic River like the Chetco. Authority for the proposed withdrawal of the Chetco is found in the Federal Land Policy and Management Act.

Issue No. October ,   Learn about Clean Air Act nonattainment area and county information for criteria pollutants. This monograph is the most comprehensive treatment available of the geology of the Santa Catalina Mountains north of Tucson, expanding greatly on classic older descriptions of the southern Catalinas. The study treats the entire range with a cross-sectional emphasis to clarify relations among the mylonitic core-complex aspects to the south, passing northward through voluminous Tertiary granitic. For purposes of this document, there are three general categories of mineral resources important to San Diego County: • Construction materials – sand, gravel, and crushed rock. This is economically the most important category of mineral resources. • Industrial and chemical mineral materials – limestone, dolomite, and marble.

  For the first time, our federal government is conducting a thorough study to identify and assess the environmental, economic, and social impacts if sulfide-ore copper mining were to be allowed on Superior National Forest lands in the watershed of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. Claims by supporters of such mining that this study is unnecessary because such a study was . During , Utah mining produced mineral commodities with an estimated gross value of $ billion. On an inflation-adjusted basis, this is a $ million (7%) increase from , but $ The state of California hosts a rich variety of minerals and rocks. The California Geological Survey provides objective geologic expertise and information about California’s diverse non-fuel mineral resources, producing maps, reports, and other data products to assist governmental agencies, mining companies, consultants, and the public in recognizing, developing, and protecting important. mineral deposition, presence of geochemical and geophysi­ cal anomalies, and applicable ore-deposit models. Mineral assessment methodology and terminology as they apply to these surveys were discussed by Goudarzi (). See the appendixes for definition of levels of mineral resource.